Description

A 53-year-old African-American man presented to a local podiatry outpatient clinic with a chief symptom of unilateral pain in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) of his left foot as well as a secondary concern of chronic low back (lumbosacral) pain. He stated that the onset of the foot pain several years ago was insidious, but has been gradually increasing in intensity. He stated that the foot pain was proportionate to the amount and speed of ambulation, and was decreased with non-weight-bearing. He also related that he noticed that the foot pain was also somewhat lessened if he ‘slowed down’, and took shorter steps. He stated that he had tried several types of corrective foot orthotic devices, both over the counter and custom made, none of which provided any significant relief. With regard to his back pain, the patient reported that he was told by his chiropractic physician that he had ‘arthritis’ at the L4–L5 disc level. The patient stated that his back pain also was not the result of any precipitating trauma, but rather seemed to have increased over the years. He denied any sciatic radiation of pain. While surgery was offered as an option for his foot pain, the patient declined and was seeking any possible non-surgical options.

Physical examination, which included a static examination, radiographs (figure 1), video gait analysis (barefoot, in a flat-soled and rocking-soled shoe), in-shoe pressure and timing analysis (video 1), revealed a planus foot, with a complete arthrodesis of the left first MTPJ. There was a decreased step length on toe-off of the left foot when compared with toe-off of the right (video 2). A set of flat-soled shoes was then given to the patient to wear as a control. The stiff sole shortened the step length of the left and right foot (video 3). The patient was then given a pair of rocking-soled shoes (figure 2) and asked to walk. Subsequently an immediate increase in step length of the left foot was observed (video 4). An improved symmetry was noted between the step length of the left and right foot. The active propulsion of the left foot markedly increased when the patient was wearing rocking-soled shoes (table 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Figure 1

Dorsoplantar radiograph of the left foot: arrow reveals degenerative changes at the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Figure 2

An example of an MBT (Masai Barefoot Technology) brand rocking bottom shoe. Note the heel-rocker, forefoot-rocker and location where the first metatarsophalangeal joint is housed. Reprinted from Romkes et al,5 with permission from Elsevier.

Hallux limitus and the end-stage consequence, hallux rigidus is a condition that ultimately inhibits dorsiflexion at the first MTPJ. During the active propulsive phase, also known as terminal stance, simultaneous dorsiflexion at the MTPJ's as the heel lifts from the ground is crucial to enable maximum forward movement of the swinging limb.1 This permits the storage and ultimate release of stored elastic energy through the gluteal region, thereby minimising the amount of input from the iliacus and psoas muscles as the stance limb begins to leave the ground.2 ,3 If pivotal movement at the first MTPJ is blocked, increased hip and knee flexion is only one of several compensatory mechanisms employed. Unfortunately this places an increased strain just below the origin of the psoas muscle in particular, resulting in an abnormal torque at the L4–L5 disc level.4

The rocking-shoe, by virtue of its ergonomically-engineered rocking platform, enables the wearer to artificially enhance their structurally-limited step length, as the first MTPJ can remain neutral while the shoe permits ‘extension’ across the forefoot. The improvement in step length once again enables the wearer to develop adequate hip extension, enabling the storage of energy which can then be released as elastic recoil. Clinically, the patient reported a reduction in foot as well as back pain (as noted in an analogue reporting chart) from a ‘10’ to a ‘3’ level.