Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Bronchial atresia with finger-in-glove sign
Free
  1. Burhan Apiliogullari1,
  2. Mehmet Yavşan2
  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey
  2. 2Department of Chest Diseases, Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey
  1. Correspondence to Dr Burhan Apiliogullari, bapiliogullari{at}yahoo.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

During a routine examination for a smoking cessation programme, a 32-year-old asymptomatic man was found to have rounded, branching opacity in the left upper lung on chest X-ray (figure 1). Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a dilated central bronchus (bronchocele) in the left upper lobe with mucous impaction of the peripheral bronchi in a branching pattern (finger-in-glove sign). In addition, the presence of segmental hyperlucency in the surrounding lung parenchyma strongly suggested the diagnosis of congenital bronchial atresia (figure 2). As the patient did not have any symptoms, he was followed up without receiving any treatment.

Figure 1

Posteroanterior chest X-ray showing finger-in-glove appearance (branching opacities) in the left lung.

Figure 2

Contrast-enhanced axial CT images with mediastinal window (A) depicting non-enhancing, branching tubular opacity. Lung window of CT (B) demonstrates hyperlucency of surrounding parenchyma of the left upper lobe.

Bronchial atresia is mostly an incidental radiographic finding in young and adult men that results from focal interruption of a segmental and subsegmental bronchus due to intrauterine ischaemia.1 ,2 It is associated with focal discontinuity of a bronchus, mucus impaction within the distal airways (bronchocele) and increased attenuation of the obstructed pulmonary segment due to collateral ventilation through the intra-alveolar pores of Kohn and the bronchoalveolar channels of Lambert.2 ,3 Most of the cases are asymptomatic. Symptomatic patients may present with pulmonary infections, mild wheezing and dyspnoea. If necessary, surgically treatment with parenchymal-sparing segmentectomy (or lobectomy) should be considered in these individuals.2

On chest X-rays or CT images, the branching dilated airways that are filled with respiratory secretions and that radiate from the hilum towards the periphery of the lung are described as being a finger-in-glove sign.1–3 It is a relatively common finding in bronchial atresia, but it is also associated with a wide variety of diseases of both congenital and acquired origin. CT images are particularly well suited for ruling out differential diagnosis of conditions such as cystic fibrosis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, bronchiectasis, foreign body aspiration, arteriovenous malformation or tumours.2 ,3 The differential diagnosis list can be easily narrowed by knowledge of the patient's medical history and predisposing factors as well as by conducting careful clinical and radiological evaluations.

Learning points

  • Bronchial atresia is usually a benign and incidentally detected condition with a male predominance. If asymptomatic, there is no need for treatment. Surgery should be considered for symptomatic patients.

  • The differential diagnosis list can be easily narrowed by knowledge of the patient's medical history and predisposing factors as well as by conducting careful clinical and radiological evaluations.

  • The classical triad of bronchial atresia consists of sudden interruption of a segmental bronchus, bronchocele with a finger-in-glove appearance and hyperinflated surrounding lung areas. Cross-sectional imaging modalities can successfully demonstrate the triad and also exclude other causes, such as tumours or vascular malformations.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors BA and MY were involved in the patient diagnosis and writing of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.