Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Description
Babinski’s sign (extensor plantar response),1 which is characterised by dorsiflexion of the great toe and variable fanning of the lateral four toes, is the prototype sign of upper motor neuron-type lesion. It is elicited by stimulation of the lateral aspect of the sole with a blunt object. A large number of variations and modifications have been described in the literature for eliciting the extensor plantar response; the most useful ones being the Chaddock sign and the Oppenheim sign. All these methods concentrate on the initial movement of the great toe.
Puusepp’s sign2 was originally described by the Estonian neurologist Ludvig Puusepp. It is the tonic, slow abduction of the little toe on plantar stimulation and may be present when the great toe extension is absent (video 1). We demonstrate Puusepp's sign in a patient with compressive cervical myelopathy due to tuberculosis—Pott's spine and paravertebral abscess (figure 1), in whom the Babinski's sign was not elicitable even in the presence of other upper motor neuron signs like spasticity and brisk deep tendon reflexes. The importance of Puusepp’s sign is that, although rarely recognised in clinical practice, it may be the only elicitable sign in certain patients with upper motor neuron type pathology and thus helps in establishing the clinical diagnosis. Thus, observing the little toe in addition to the great toe while stimulating the lateral aspect of the sole for Babinski's sign provides important clinical information.
Learning points
-
Puusepp's sign is the tonic, slow abduction movement of the little toe on stimulation of the lateral aspect of the sole with a blunt object.
-
Clinical significance of Puusepp's sign arises in cases with upper motor neuron-type lesions and absent Babinski's sign; in which case it points to corticospinal tract pathology.
Footnotes
-
Contributors All authors contributed to the planning, conduct and reporting of the work described in the article, and justifiably credited with authorship, according to the authorship criteria. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. CS is the guarantor.
-
Competing interests None.
-
Patient consent Obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.