Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Infectious pacemaker exteriorisation
Free
  1. Uday Yanamandra1,
  2. Sushma Yanamandra2,
  3. Navreet Singh3,
  4. Velu Nair4
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  2. 2Department of Medicine, CAIMS, Karimnagar, Andhra Pradesh, India
  3. 3Department of Cardiology, Army Hospital Research & Referral, New Delhi, India
  4. 4Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Uday Yanamandra, udayj2{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A 68-year-old man who 1 year previously had been fitted with a permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) for symptomatic sinus bradycardia was admitted with recurrent syncope and intermittent moderate-grade fever for 2 months. He was on intermittent antibiotics from rural health centre for the same duration with no improvement in his condition.

On examination, he was frail with exteriorisation of the pacemaker (figure 1) with pus exuding from the pacemaker pocket. Transoesophageal echocardiography revealed subvalvular vegetation suggestive of subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE). All other haematological and biochemical parameters were normal. Pus culture from the pocket revealed Gram-positive cocci in groups sensitive to β-lactams and vancomycin. Repeated blood cultures were sterile. He was managed with removal of pacemaker/leads, management of SBE with antibiotics (vancomycin with ceftriaxone) for 3 weeks, transient glycopyrrolate/external pacemaker management and replacement of pacemaker on a later date on opposite side.

Figure 1

Exteriorised pacemaker in a case of implantation site infection leading to skin necrosis.

Pacemaker pocket erosion caused by generator is usually a result of pocket infection which later leads to exteriorisation of the pacemaker. It is a rare complication of PPI (incidence <1%) commonly seen in elderly patients with decreased subcutaneous fat/fragile skin, PPI in a small pocket, use of harsh/strong disinfectants with increased scrubbing and prolonged steroid intake.1 Exteriorisation obligates intense antibiotics therapy and removal of the pacemaker owing to bacterial contamination and its intravascular/intracardiac spread through pacemaker leads.2

Prophylactic anti-staphylococcal antibiotic treatment during implantation may prevent not only PPI infections but also pacemaker exteriorisation linked to hidden infections.3

Learning points

  • Pacemaker exteriorisation is commonly an aftermath of implantation site infection.

  • Infection can spread through the leads of exteriorised pacemaker to blood stream.

  • Immediate removal of the device is essential in such cases.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the O/o DGAFMS for all the cooperation.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors were involved in managing and preparing the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.