Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Images in...
Round cell epithelioid GIST (gastrointestinal stromal tumour) in an endoscopic biopsy is a diagnostic confounder
Free
  1. Andleeb Abrari,
  2. Urmi Mukherjee,
  3. Rajesh Tandon,
  4. M Chandrashekhar
  1. Histopathology Department, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andleeb Abrari, abrariand{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

The authors present a case of a 53-year-old lady, with vague upper gastrointestinal symptoms and progressive iron deficiency anaemia, stool positive for occult blood and progressive weight loss. Endoscopically a lumenally protruding mass, with extensive mucosal ulceration was seen. Carcinoma, stromal tumour and lymphoma were the clinical differential diagnoses. Histologic sections showed a dense, diffuse and adhesive mucosal infiltrate of round cells. The tumour cells were round, with high nuclear – cytoplasmic ratios, without any specific cyto-architectural attribute except rare subtle plasmacytoid aspect (figures 1 and 2A,B). A non-Hodgkin lymphoma and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma were initially considered, and immunochemistry requisitioned. The initial sets of immunomarkers showed the infiltrating cells to be negative for epithelial markers – pan-cytokeratin (CK), antiepithelial membrane antigen and CK 7, or leucocyte, B lymphocyte and plasma cell lineage markers (antileucocyte common antigen, CD 20,CD 79a, CD 138 and CD38). The second phalanx of immunostains included antihuman melanoma antigen (HMB) 45, Vimentin, S-100, Desmin, Ki-67, CD 117 and CD 34. The tumour cells were observed to diffusely label with CD117, vimentin and CD34, and unmarked by HMB 45, S-100 (melanoma markers) and desmin (muscle). With this immunoprofile, a histologic diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) was rendered and was confirmed upon examination of the surgical resection specimen (figure 2C). Gastrointestinal stromal tumours are the most common mesenchymal tumours affecting all segments of the gastrointestinal tract, arising from the interstitial cells of Cajal, in the muscularis propria. These tumours equally affect female and male patients, with more than 75% of the cases occurring in patients older than 50 years. Five per cent of the lesions arise in the oesophagus, 50% in the stomach, 25% in the small bowel and 10% in the colon and rectum.1,,3 GISTs in 70% of cases are composed of spindle cells, in 20% of epithelioid cells, and the remainder have a mixed cellular composition.3 GISTs with epitheloid features often have large polygonal cells with abundant cytoplasm and indistinct cell borders. They may be multinucleated and may thus display focal pleomorphism not usually found in spindle cell tumours.2 Since not all mesenchymal lesions of the gastrointestinal tube are GISTs, and a tissue diagnosis is imperative, preoperatively – obtaining a tissue specimen through invasive means is extremely desirable. Imaging (CT, endoscopic ultrasound) impressions are at best presumptive, with issues of ready accessibility and costs involved; and modalities like endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration – will yield cytology smears – not yet optimal samples for the GIST defining immunostains – endoscopic biopsy is, and will be the first essay in the investigation of presumptive GISTs, even with the accepted limitations of yield in sub mucosal/mural lesions. Tumours with monomorphous cellularity as the one described in the present case will have a broad histologic differential including undifferentiated/poorly differentiated carcinoma, lymphoma, plasmactoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroendocrine tumour, rhabdoid tumour and synovial sarcoma. Suspicion index, clinico-pathologic correlation and a broad spanning immunohistochemistry panel will resolve the diagnosis in the majority of cases.

Figure 1

Mucosal infiltrate by largely homomorphous round cells.

Figure 2

Image panels of gastric mucosal biopsy showing infiltration of mucosa by dehesive round cells. (A, B) Histology in the surgically resected specimen showing is similar. (C) Immunoperoxidase stains demonstrate expression of CD117, CD34 and vimentin.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.