Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Unexpected outcome (positive or negative) including adverse drug reactions
Minimal access is not maximal safety: pelviureteric necrosis following percutaneous chemical lumbar sympathectomy
  1. S M Wijeyaratne1,
  2. L N Seneviratne2,
  3. K Umashankar2,
  4. N D Perera2
  1. 1Department of Surgery, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  2. 2Department of Urology, National Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka
  1. Correspondence to S M Wijeyaratne, mandika59{at}hotmail.com

Summary

Lumbar sympathectomy remains popular in the treatment of a variety of painful and circulatory conditions of the lower extremities. Although percutaneous chemical lumbar sympathectomy (PCLS) under radiographic guidance is minimally invasive and has decreased the need for open surgical sympathectomy, inadvertent damage to neighbouring structures is a matter for concern. We report the case of a 38-year-old man with thromboangiitis obliterans who had PCLS under radiographic guidance for relief of ischaemic rest pain that was complicated by necrotic disruption of the left pelviureteric region. The kidney was salvaged with an ureterocalycostomy and he remains well 4 years later. Such complications point to imprecise and unpredictable spread of the injected chemical too far beyond the needle tip. It is possible that such complications are often under reported and, therefore, not taken into consideration during informed consent. Precise neurolysis with laser and radiofrequency may be a safer alternative.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.