Article Text

Images In...
The wandering splenunculus: a diagnostic dilemma
Free
  1. Gráinne M Murphy1,
  2. Simon Rajendran2,
  3. Adrian Ireland2,
  4. Deirdre O’Hanlon2,
  5. Michael Murphy3
  1. 1
    Cork University Hospital, Radiology, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
  2. 2
    South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital, Surgery, Old Blackrock Road, Cork, Ireland
  3. 3
    South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital, Radiology, Old Blackrock Road, Cork, Ireland
  1. Simon Rajendran, simonrajendran{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A 63-year-old man with a history of radical prostatectomy for prostate carcinoma was diagnosed as having synchronous rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma and ileal carcinoid. He underwent a sigmoid colectomy, right hemicolectomy and defunctioning ileostomy, which was successfully reversed 1 month later.

On a follow-up CT scan at 6 months, a 9 mm soft tissue density nodule was identified in the left upper quadrant lateral to the spleen, which was not present previously, raising the suspicion of a peritoneal deposit. However on careful review of the patient’s previous CT scans, this was shown to represent a highly mobile splenunculus on a long vascular pedicle that had moved from the splenic hilum to the lateral aspect of spleen (fig 1).

Figure 1

A 9 mm splenunculus ((A), arrow) on an 8 cm vascular pedicle ((A), arrowhead). The splenunculus was noted on the anterior aspect ((B), arrow) and splenic hilar region ((C), arrow) on previous scans.

Single or multiple splenunculi are a common finding on modern cross-sectional imaging and rarely present a diagnostic challenge.1 A mobile splenunculus however, as in this case, is a rare condition1 that may be misdiagnosed as a new peritoneal or metastatic deposit. The important diagnostic features are changing position on interval scanning and identification of a vascular supply.

This case highlights the importance of having a high index of suspicion for splenunculi on cross sectional imaging scans in malignancy staging as they occasionally show marked mobility with the potential for misinterpretation.2,3 A diligent search for a vascular supply and a careful review of previous imaging should confirm the diagnosis. Follow-up imaging may be required when findings are inconclusive.

REFERENCES

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None.

  • Patient consent: Patient/guardian consent was obtained for publication.