Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Result of delayed repair of quadriceps muscle following a sharp cut injury
  1. Hira Lal Nag,
  2. Gunjar Jain,
  3. Mayur Nayak and
  4. Archit Goyal
  1. Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gunjar Jain; drgunjarjain{at}gmail.com

Abstract

We herewith report a case of a 22-year-old man who suffered from a transverse laceration of the quadriceps muscle. The patient presented to us after 3 months of the injury with an inability to extend the knee. We undertook a surgical repair of the muscle tear using the modified Mason-Allen technique and a polypropylene mesh augmentation. To the best of our knowledge, the use of polypropylene mesh for repair augmentation of mid-substance tear of quadriceps muscle has never been described in the literature. The patient had achieved a full active knee extension at 9 months following the surgery. At 3 years of follow-up, the patient has maintained the movements and strength of the knee. He has no functional limitations and is satisfied with the outcome. Thus, the middle term results are good and the treatment is promising.

  • musculoskeletal and joint disorders
  • orthopaedics
  • midsubstance tears

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @Gunjarj, @Archit18Goyal

  • Contributors GJ: patient evaluation, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing-original draft preparation. HLN: patient evaluation, surgery, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, validation, supervision. MN: patient evaluation, methodology, validation. AG: patient evaluation, methodology, validation.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.