Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Case report
Incidental endobronchial hamartoma in a patient with enchondroma
  1. Arun Kadamkulam Syriac1,
  2. Amrit Ved Bhaskarla1,
  3. Mohamed Elrifai2 and
  4. Abdul H Alraiyes3,4
  1. 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
  2. 2 Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  3. 3 Cancer Treatment Centers of America Chicago, Zion, Illinois, USA
  4. 4 Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Arun Kadamkulam Syriac, drsyriac{at}gmail.com, arun.syriac{at}rosalindfranklin.edu

Abstract

Hamartomas are the most common type of benign tumours of the lung, constituting a small portion of all lung neoplasms. Hamartomas are rare benign tumours composed of multiple mesenchymal cell lines. Two clinical types have been defined according to the location: intraparenchymal and endobronchial, more frequently the former. We present a case of endobronchial hamartoma causing significant blockage of the right middle lobe. The finding was incidental on a CT scan of the chest done for staging purposes for a large mixed lytic and sclerotic lesion that was found within the proximal-mid portion of the tibial diaphysis. The endobronchial lesion was removed by hot electrocautery snare during bronchoscopy and identified as a hamartoma. Argon plasma coagulation was applied to the lesion’s base afterwards and the patient was to follow-up in 3 months for a repeat CT scan.

  • lung cancer (oncology)
  • respiratory cancer
  • bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AKS: did ground work including collecting images, designing flowcharts and writing up the case. AVB: contributed by writing up the case and performed the literature search. ME: drafted and reviewed the case report, along with contributions to the discussion portion of the case. AHA: identified the case, reviewed the case report, and made significant changes, including designing the flowcharts and giving expert opinions on the subject.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.