Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Perimesencephalic and sulcal subarachnoid haemorrhage: an interesting presentation of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
Free
  1. Rajesh Shankar Iyer,
  2. Ramakrishnan Tirupur Chinnappan Ramalingam,
  3. Saleem Akhtar,
  4. Karunakaran Muthukalathi
  1. Department of Neurology, KG Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rajesh Shankar Iyer, dr_rsh{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A 38-year-old man with hypertension presented with sudden-onset headache and vomiting. He was irritable and had a blood pressure of 180/120 mm Hg. There were no meningeal signs or focal neurological deficits. His optic fundi were normal. Initial evaluation with CT of the brain showed subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) in the right parasagittal sulcal region (figure 1A) and the left perimesencephalic cistern (figure 1B). A CT angiogram (CTA) followed by a digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) ruled out aneurysms (figure 1C–F). The venous phase of DSA (figure 1G) and magnetic resonance (MR) venogram (figure 1H,I) were normal. MRI of the brain (figure 2) showed hyperintense lesions in the bilateral parieto-occipital regions and the basal ganglia suggesting posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). He was managed with antihypertensives and made a gradual and complete recovery.

Figure 1

CT of the brain showing right parasagittal sulcal (A, arrow) and left perimesencephalic subarachnoid haemorrhage (B, arrow). CT angiography (C) was negative for aneurysms. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with selective right carotid injection, anteroposterior (D) and lateral (F) views, and left carotid injection (E) ruled out aneurysms. The venous phase of DSA (G) and magnetic resonance venogram (H, I) were normal.

Figure 2

MRI of the brain fluid-attenuated inversion recovery   (FLAIR) images (A, D) showing hyperintense lesions over the bilateral parieto-occipital and basal ganglial regions suggestive of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. The diffusion-weighted images (B, E) and the corresponding apparent diffusion coefficient images (C, F) show no diffusion restriction.

Our patient presented with non-traumatic SAH on an emergent head CT scan. It showed simultaneous presence of blood in two interesting locations. The first is the perimesencephalic region, where the majority of cases are negative for aneurysms and is considered due to venous rupture.1 Around 10% of spontaneous SAH presents this way. Very rarely they can be due to ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysms, cervical spinal arteriovenous malformations or dural arteriovenous fistulas.

Another distinct category of spontaneous SAH accounting for around 7% is the peripheral convexal SAH, where the bleeding is localised to a few sulci of the cerebral convexities without bleeding elsewhere. This again is a non-aneurysmal form of SAH predominantly due to cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the elderly and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) in the young.2 The other causes are cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, atherosclerotic large-vessel occlusion, infections, coagulation disorders, moyamoya disease, cerebral vasculitis and PRES.

Studies have reported haemorrhage in PRES in 5%–17% of patients.3 They present either as sulcal SAH, minute parenchymal haemorrhages or focal haematomas in the brain parenchyma. Perimesencephalic cistern is an unreported site for bleeding due to PRES. The mechanism of haemorrhage in PRES is uncertain and controversial. Severe hypertension and the associated impaired cerebral autoregulation and rupture of pial vessels may be one mechanism. However haemorrhage is found to be equally common in normotensive patients developing PRES. The other mechanism is the postischaemic reperfusion injury following vasoconstriction of medium-sized and large-sized vessels occurring in PRES.

The possibility of vasospasm after SAH was considered. This usually develops between the fourth and ninth day after SAH, and we had completed our investigations before this time. There were also no angiographic changes compatible with vasospasm. In comparison with aneurysmal SAH, non-aneurysmal SAH especially the perimesencephalic variety has a low incidence of vasospasm.

The other issue here is the ideal imaging modality to be adopted when we deal with SAH in these two interesting locations occurring simultaneously in the same patient. A high-quality CTA is enough to identify the rare possibility of vertebrobasilar aneurysms in perimesencephalic haemorrhage. MRI of the brain with MR venography may be sufficient as the initial diagnostic work-up in convexal SAH. Vascular imaging may be necessary to detect RCVS and vasculitis. Since both the locations are known to be more commonly associated with non-aneurysmal SAH, their combined presence on either side of the brain should only strengthen this association. We probably should have opted for MRI after the CTA and could have avoided DSA. Our team wanted to rule out the possibility of a small anterior cerebral artery aneurysm causing the parasagittal bleed and went ahead with DSA. It is prudent to conclude that non-invasive imaging modalities including parenchymal and vascular imaging are sufficient in such situations, and DSA be performed only if the non-invasive tests prove inconclusive.

Learning points

  • Perimesencephalic and sulcal subarachnoid haemorrhages are more commonly non-aneurysmal.

  • Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome can present as perimesencephalic and sulcal subarachnoid haemorrhages in an emergent CT scan.

  • Non-invasive imaging modalities of the brain looking for parenchymal and vascular abnormalities are generally sufficient to clinch the diagnosis in such a presentation.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors RSI was involved in the design, data acquisition, interpretation and the intellectual content of the draft. RTCR and SA contributed towards intellectual content. KM contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the images.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.